Judging Rubric
Tier One: Does the video follow the guidelines? (Yes/No)
-
Does the video run within the 5-Minutes time limit? Yes
-
Is the information included in the video accurate and current? Yes
-
Are any copyrighted materials used in the video? No
-
Is any portion of the video inappropriate? No
-
For Finalists: Did the sender compete all necessary forms (online entry form, parent permission form, and, if needed, actor release forms)? Yes
Tier Two: Quality of Video
35% – Content Quality: Does the video clearly make the connection between content and the chosen topic?
4 Points
Content is clearly tied in with topic in an obvious manner; a strong connection is shown between theme and topic.
3 Points
Content is tied in with topic; a fairly clear connection is made between theme and topic.
2 Points
Content is mentioned but the connection to topic is not supported.
1 Points
Content is not tied in with topic; no connection between theme and topic is made.
Does the video explain why the chosen topic is important generally?
4 Points
The video expertly makes the case for the topic’s importance using precise arguments.
3 Points
The video explains the topic’s importance but the arguments are not complete.
2 Points
The video states that the topic is important but provides little explanation.
1 Points
The video does not explain why the chosen topic is important.
35% – Memorable/Creative: How well does the video draw in the viewer and keep their attention?
4 Points
Viewer is left with a strong understanding of the topic, will remember the video, and feels like they want to learn more.
3 Points
Viewer is left with general understanding and will remember the video.
2 Points
Viewer mostly understands the topic and might remember the video. Some introduced themes/topics may distract from message.
1 Points
Presentation is unclear on the topic and unmemorable.
Is the video original and innovative?
4 Points
Video is original, creative and unique.
3 Points
Video has some original thought and is moderately creative.
2 Points
Video has little original thinking.
1 Points
Video has no original thinking.
20% – Logical Solution: Is the solution offered appropriate and supported by your claims?
4 Points
A strong solution is offered that is both logical and appropriate.
3 Points
A solution is offered but doesn’t clearly connect to the video’s claims. The solution is appropriate.
2 Points
A solution is offered by does not match the video’s claims or is not appropriate.
1 Points
No solution is offered.
10% – Production: What is the overall quality of production (including visual and sound elements)?
4 Points
Video is well planned with smooth transitions and edits. Sound is expertly balanced and easy to hear. All sound and visual elements coincide with the video’s message.
3 Points
Video is well planned with competent edits. Sound is well balanced and easy to hear. Most sound and visual elements blend with video’s message.
2 Points
Video was somewhat planned. Transitions and edits are rudimentary. Sound is reasonably balanced. Some sound and visual elements are distracting.
1 Points
Video is not well planned and has poor edits. Sound is of poor quality. Many sound and visual elements distract from the video’s message.